katherine_b: (DW - Doctor hair what to do)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] katherine_b at 11:37pm on 14/11/2011 under
OH. DEAR. LORD.

"Harry Potter" director David Yates is teaming up with the BBC to turn its iconic sci-fi TV series "Doctor Who" into a bigscreen franchise.
Yates, who directed the last four Potter films, told Daily Variety that he is about to start work on developing a "Doctor Who" movie with Jane Tranter, head of L.A.-based BBC Worldwide Prods.

"We're looking at writers now. We're going to spend two to three years to get it right," he said. "It needs quite a radical transformation to take it into the bigger arena."

"Doctor Who" follows the adventures across space and time of a super-intelligent alien in human form, who battles a variety of cosmic bad guys aided by plucky human companions.

"The notion of the time-travelling Time Lord is such a strong one, because you can express story and drama in any dimension or time," Yates said.

The series ran from 1963 to 1989, and then was successfully rebooted in 2005 by writer Russell T. Davies and subsequently by Steven Moffat ("The Adventures of Tintin"). Tranter oversaw the revival when she was the BBC's drama topper in London.

"Doctor Who," starring Matt Smith as the 11th incarnation of the Doctor, is now one of the pubcaster's most lucrative global TV franchises.

The series airs Stateside on BBC America.

Yates made clear that his movie adaptation would not follow on from the current TV series, but would take a completely fresh approach to the material.

"Russell T. Davies and then Steven Moffat have done their own transformations, which were fantastic, but we have to put that aside and start from scratch," he said.

Yates and Tranter are looking for writers on both sides of the Atlantic.

"We want a British sensibility, but having said that, Steve Kloves wrote the Potter films and captured that British sensibility perfectly, so we are looking at American writers too," he explained.

There are two previous films, based on the TV series: "Doctor Who and the Daleks" (1965) and "Doctor Who: Daleks' Invasion Earth 2150 A.D." (1966), both starring Peter Cushing.

The BBC has since made a few unsuccessful attempts to develop a "Doctor Who" feature, and shot a one-off telepic in 1996 at a time when the TV series was dormant.

But the combination of Yates and Tranter means this is the most high-powered effort to date to launch "Doctor Who" onto the bigscreen.

Before directing "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" and both parts of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," Yates worked with Tranter on several BBC TV series, including "The Way We Live Now" and "State of Play."

[Poll #1795001]
Mood:: 'nauseated' nauseated
There are 31 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] jessicaqueen.livejournal.com at 11:40pm on 14/11/2011
I'll tell you something. I'm dying for them to make this so I can sit back and marvel at just how bad it is. Like reading badfic for the fun of it, y'know? I can't wait for the Doctor to turn out to be a secret ninja or something. XD
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 11:41pm on 14/11/2011
Darn it! Now you're making me actually want to see it! Who would they cast as the Doctor though?
 
posted by [identity profile] jessicaqueen.livejournal.com at 11:44pm on 14/11/2011
Ah, well, someone on one of the comms said that in Americanising it they'd probably have the Doctor go around shirtless most of the time, just cuz. That idea sort of stuck with me, so I'm fully expecting Taylor Lautner to stroll out of the TARDIS with his equally clothing deficient posse.
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 11:48pm on 14/11/2011
Oh. Dear. God. No. Then our precious fandom would be invaded by Twihards. How can you suggest such a thing?!

That said, there are a few people I would quite like to see shirtless a lot... (Isn't it time Colin Firth played the Doctor?)
 
posted by [identity profile] jessicaqueen.livejournal.com at 11:52pm on 14/11/2011
Oh no, it can't possibly be a British Doctor. Silly. Don't you realise how reasonable you're sounding? But still. I could get on board with a bit of sans shirt action.

The Doctor has no outfit. The Doctor needs no outfit.
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 11:53pm on 14/11/2011
Well, of course. How could I possibly have a British institution played by someone from Britain? I don't know what I was thinking!

Mmm, nekkid!Doctor...
 
posted by [identity profile] jennytork.livejournal.com at 11:45pm on 14/11/2011
Been done twice.

Both horrible.

Even if the second one DID have the actor that would eventually become Wilf as a companion.

Been done as a TV movie, too -- 8th Doctor Ahoy!
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 11:50pm on 14/11/2011
Tell me about it! I really don't understand why they have to mess with things like that. And it would be utterly stupid to step so obviously out of sequence by having an entirely different Doctor. All we would end up with is more of the "But he's not the real Doctor" whinges like one gets with the Peter Cushing films.
nobleplatypus: (avps in a raaaage)
posted by [personal profile] nobleplatypus at 12:05am on 15/11/2011
I've heard it's Just Another Unsubstantiated Movie Rumor, so I'm saving my rage for the entirely unnecessary BSG remake that actually does appear to be happening.
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 12:08am on 15/11/2011
I'm more than happy for it to be so. I've heard movie rumours since Series 4, but this was the first time I'd heard so many names associated with it.

Although I'm not a fan of BSG, I do share your pain. Remakes can be the work of the devil.
 
posted by [identity profile] caz963.livejournal.com at 12:37am on 15/11/2011
Absolutely not if they're "starting from scratch" and I suppose they'd have to if they're making a film for general consumption rather than an established DW audience.

I know the Beeb is desperate for money but still...
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 12:39am on 15/11/2011
Frankly, considering the merchandise they keep clobbering us over the head with, one wonders why they ARE so short of cash.
 
posted by [identity profile] ladyniko.livejournal.com at 05:27am on 17/11/2011
And, the cost of the DVDs!

Their DVDs are higher priced for less episodes than the American shows with more episodes!

That's what's so disheartening about it - I can't afford their DVDs. :(
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 05:29am on 17/11/2011
Absolutely! I tend to wait until they are on massive sale on Amazon and snap them up them. I got Series 1-4 for about a quarter of the price by doing that.
 
posted by [identity profile] time-converges.livejournal.com at 12:47am on 15/11/2011
Well, if it's true, it will depend on how he intends to "reboot" it, and who will be in it - i might need to see how much of a train wreck it will be. He did a good job with the HP movies though, at least I thought so, so you never know! I'm glad it'll give fandom something to talk about for years to come, lol.
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 02:46am on 15/11/2011
We can but hope. Sadly, though, I'm not particularly positive...
snowflakie06: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] snowflakie06 at 01:21am on 15/11/2011
I don't know if I want a Doctor Who movie or not, but I definitely DO NOT want Yates to direct it. I've only seen the first 6 Harry Potter movies so I've only seen 2 of the 4 that he directed and those two were my absolute least favorite of the series. Though my not watching 7.1 & 7.2 has nothing to do with Yates, I'm just not sure I'm ready to see "the end of an era" yet XD
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 03:01am on 15/11/2011
I certainly don't blame you on the 'end of an era' pain, and I can also see where you're coming from with Yates. It would be a truly dark and miserable experience with him at the helm, and the only benefit I could see is that perhaps Ten wouldn't be seen as quite such a misery-guts anymore. ;-)
 
posted by [identity profile] jpgr.livejournal.com at 02:01am on 15/11/2011
Previously there had been talk of a movie (pre-reboot) and I named Ioan Gruffudd. I think now he would have a better shot since more people are familiar with him via "Fantastic Four" and now "Ringer".

I'm of the opinion that it could utterly fantastic or complete crap - no middle ground here.
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 03:02am on 15/11/2011
Ooh, Ioan Gruffudd would make me very, very happy.

And yes, there is definitely no chance of it just being 'meh.'
bas_math_girl: Tardis (Tardis)
posted by [personal profile] bas_math_girl at 03:06am on 15/11/2011
Yates didn't ruin the Harry Potter films, so as long as he chooses the Doctor well I'll watch. I could cope with Hugh Jackman running around without his shirt...
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 03:24am on 15/11/2011
*lol* Well, yes, there has to be at least one upside. ;-)
 
posted by [identity profile] pickledminx.livejournal.com at 04:35am on 15/11/2011
Yes!!! :D I think that would be brilliant! It'll be odd to see it 'start from scratch' - but it'll be exciting to see who the new doctor and companions and ect might be, anyways :) Also, coming from one of the Harry Potter directors, that's big! Especially as OOTP was one of my fave out of the moves :)
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 05:45am on 15/11/2011
It will certainly be interesting to see exactly what take they have on the whole thing!
 
posted by [identity profile] lejays17.livejournal.com at 09:10am on 15/11/2011
I'll reserve judgement on the movie til it gets closer to being done. Plenty of things are "in talks" about getting made, but never see the light of day.

I will see it (assuming it is made, of course), and will drag SLOC to see it with me, and then defend it to the death afterwards.

Hmm, casting choices... As long as whoever they pick is older than Matt Smith, I'll be happy - they're going to run into "child labour laws" if the Doctor regenerates younger again!
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 10:07am on 15/11/2011
Yes, that's probably a good move. I could spout reams of vitriol and then end up loving it or vice versa.

And yes, I'd quite like an older Doctor as well.
 
posted by [identity profile] lizarfau.livejournal.com at 09:21am on 15/11/2011
I don't like the idea of something British being Americanised, so I'd be a 'no'. However, it surely couldn't be worse than what we have in place in the current Moffatt era. I think Dr Who is dreadful these days and seems to get worse with each passing episode.

And why are only British and American writers being considered? What's wrong with Aussies? Put your hand up, KB!
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 10:08am on 15/11/2011
It sort of was with Eight, wasn't it? And yes, I agree. I only watched one full episode last season and that was after much recommendation by friends. I have no intention of watching the Christmas ep or anything.

Ooh, the temptation...
 
posted by [identity profile] ddshipper9692.livejournal.com at 06:07am on 26/11/2011
I don't know if they should although my reasoning is that I'm such a D/D shipper and Im not really a fan of tv shows being made into movies (don't know why) however as a whovian I feel that if they do I will go and see it anyways
 
posted by [identity profile] katherine-b.livejournal.com at 06:50am on 26/11/2011
I'm inclined to agree with all of this actually.
 
posted by [identity profile] ddshipper9692.livejournal.com at 06:57am on 26/11/2011
Hahaha thanks I'm glad someone does and that it made sense :-D

December

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
8
 
9 10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31